By Samantha Clark Oakland Tribune
Posted:
08/09/2014 06:57:41 AM PDT
7 Comments | Updated: about 5 hours ago

Antoinette Henderson holds a document next to a tag to document the
graffiti before abating it off a business on 12th Avenue at E. 12th
Street in the San Antonio District in Oakland, Calif., on Friday, Aug.
8, 2014. Documenting the different tags is part of a process to help
prosecute taggers according to Ken Houston who developed the graffiti
removal program. Community leaders and volunteers gathered for "Clean
Sweep II" abating graffiti in a 4 block radius. (Laura A. Oda/Bay Area
News Group)
OAKLAND
— Property owners in the heavily tagged areas of Oakland can pay a
hefty tab to keep their buildings graffiti-free. Vandals keep coming
back, and nothing is off limits.
Not even churches are left untouched. Graffiti abatement also costs the
city of Oakland more than $1 million a year, and property owners who
fail to clean their buildings can face fines from the city. The
seemingly endless cycle leaves them feeling helpless.
“I stopped repainting because they come back,” said Don Chan, manager of
an auto body shop off E.12th Street in the San Antonio neighborhood.
“Because the law is not serious. Why can’t they catch them? I don’t
think the city punishes the people.

Council member Pat Kernighan, left, with volunteers and fellow community
members get busy rolling paint over graffiti on the corner of
International Boulevard and 12th Avenue in the San Antonio District in
Oakland, Calif., on Friday, Aug. 8, 2014. Community leaders and
volunteers gathered for "Clean Sweep II" event abating graffiti in a 4
block radius.(Laura A. Oda/Bay Area News Group)
”
That might change if Ken Houston, chairman of the East Oakland Beautification Council, has his way.
“The graffiti has to stop. It’s destroying our city,” Houston said.
“The city is not doing its job. They’re calling shots from behind desks. You got to be touching the ground.”
The Alameda County district attorney’s office, along with the Oakland
City Attorney and Oakland Police Department, is trying to do something.
“We’re going to look at all issues of blight if it’s illegal dumping or
vandalism of any sort, obviously that will include graffiti,” said
District Attorney spokeswoman Teresa Drenick. “We are committed to
charging the cases that we can prove beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Houston said his group is documenting graffiti tags as evidence for the
District Attorney. Councilmember Pat Kernighan, who is not seeking
re-election, asked Houston to tackle the graffiti in her council
district after noting the success the group’s efforts in May along a
2.25-mile stretch on San Leandro Street.
That East Oakland corridor, which is now closely monitored, from the
Oakland and San Leandro city border to Coliseum BART station is seeing a
low return of graffiti and is expected to have even less with the
second phase of its cleanup next week.
“I said, ’OK, I want to know how he’s doing it,’ ” Kernighan said as she
took pictures with Houston, a mayoral candidate, and Dana King, who is
vying to replace Kernighan. “It’s really hard to catch people in the
act, but the community itself also has a responsibility to keep their
buildings clean.”
Although few residents showed up to help, Kernighan said she hopes that
efforts to clean the graffiti in her district will show frustrated
property owners that they can do something to curb rampant graffiti
themselves.
The first step of the beautification council’s process is defining a
strict area and quickly painting over graffiti without worrying about
matching colors or other aesthetic details, Houston said. After making a
point about zero tolerance, he and his crew return for a more detailed
cleanup. Then, they provide property owners with the tools necessary for
maintaining the area themselves.
Last year, the City Council passed a law that criminalized tagging while
approving $400,000 to fund mural projects.(Oakland is basking in mural
renaissance, and the walls of vibrant color have become points of
neighborhood pride. Desi Mundo, founder of the Community Rejuvenation
Project, a muralist collective, said that murals discourage tagging and
provide a creative canvas rather than a criminal sentencing.
“We can criminalize the youth or we can give them some civic ownership
of the spaces where they reside,” he said. “In the most powerful
situations, murals speak to the community. They can tell its history,
share its heroes and stories. So people respect that.”